Eastern Health reviewing why policy not followed in disposal of Dako machine

Is This A Real Surprise?

Just imagine being told all of your medical records before year 2000, no longer existed!, that all files were destroyed as part of the weeding program to reduce paper storage and paper mites?

According to information provided to me by medical records department at HSC and St. Clare's, regarding a personal case of my own, I went seeking particular information that should be in my medical file, that could potentially lend diagnostic support to a more recent medical mystery with me.

I learned that this is allegedly across the board, and supposedly not unique to me. Well in the matter of the findings, this information has not been proven otherwise different.

The Telegram Reported On 30/10/2008: "Eastern Health is investigating why its own policy wasn’t followed when a key machine in the hormone receptor testing scandal was given away. Self-employed service technician Joe White testified Wednesday he got the Dako machine from lab administration in late 2004 or early 2005 and sold it to a U.S. pathology broker for $4,000 U.S."

"Investigate Why Their Policy"......... just what does this mean in the scheme of things? Who investigates? What Set of Criteria or Rules of Procedure and Practice are used in order to investigate? In this case, who judges?

It would seem predominantly clear to most people, that in a situation such as, that a policy would exist whereby an inventory list of equipment would exist. Of course this inventory would be databased in several query's. (Q1) Equipment Name & Type, It's Description & Usage, It's Unit Of Location, It's Condition Status, and most certainly it's Reliability. (Q2) It's Life Cycle, It's Age, It's Repair History. (Q3) End Of Life Inspection, Qualifiers, Person Submitting Report, Recommendations for Disposal. (Q4) Method of Disposal, Company or Individual Contracted to Dispose, Report of Disposal.

In any disposal method, it would first seem necessary to remove all hard discs from computers or computer operated equipment, of course after all important and personal data is removed.

It's difficult these days to understand who is Christ or the anti Christ with either the Dept. of Health, or its agencies. It has been made abundantly clear that the only truth to come out of Eastern Health is the number of how many times they cannot recall.

This latest revelation is yet another stroke of bad luck for Eastern Health. I mean, let us humor ourselves and even pretend that we can see how this could happen! When the
god forsaken reality is, it's another set-up and likely pay-off.

Investigations prove what? That there is always a fall guy, the system never takes responsibility. Here we are in a major crisis, people died for Jesus sake, and unnecessarily, and we get what? "AN APOLOGY' mother of god, the corruption wreaks, it's present, it's in your face and Newfoundlanders and Labradoreans are satisfied with "We Are Sorry"


In any court room case, this kind destruction of evidence of this importance would certainly be deemed in contempt and criminal. This is not just a mistake, and for those taking the word from an inquire that started a lie and will end a lie should not bear any right to offer an opinion even.

No one will be accountable for this act of malice, human suffering, death and biggest show of incompetence in the history of our province, the only ones to pay will be those who already paid with their lives.

To Eastern Health.... The slogan herein is right, when in gods name will you begin delivery?

Widespread “cushion” and “comfort” among all leading regimes across the province has given rise to an “elevated culture of entitlement”, and within this “madness”, leading doctors and lawyer’s work-in-tandem as the principal players.

Responsibility and even “morality” eludes them in their primary quest to “sustain” the lifestyle by constantly “covering” for one another. It is an “ignoramus” mutual admiration “society” wherein no “one”, does anything wrong.

When called to task, as is occurring now, “players” who are questioned are “blinded” and at a “loss” because the ones “asking” the questions are “known already” to be “fellow players” who are “equally” reprehensible, and mad.

Brudder