Monday, July 20, 2009

N.L. housing rent increase upsets tenant

An upcoming rent increase has upset at least one resident of a neighbourhood in the east end of St. John's.

The Newfoundland and Labrador Housing Corporation advised tenants last week that it's raising rent based on current market conditions.

Dennis Madden, who lives in a housing corporation apartment building in Pleasantville, said most residents are retirees or seniors, and the planned five per cent increase will hit them hard.

"I have no problem with the fact that I have to pay rent, but I don't think I am being treated with due concern and consideration by an agency of government when I am told that I have to pay extra at the very time when current market conditions are eroding my income," he said.

Madden said he would like to see the rent increase put on hold until financial conditions improve for seniors and retirees.

In November, Madden's rent will go from from $700 to $735 a month.

"Based On Current Market Conditions". Isn't NL Housing Corp. A Non-Profit Agency of Government, and Governed by the same department that has a maximum rent threshold subsidy of $372.00 per month? If a family on income support from HRLE is paying $372.00 per month, why are seniors on fixed income paying nearly double period?

Our New Found Wealth, and Have Status has seemingly created a whole bunch of "you cant's" for the most vulnerable amongst our people.

I am overwhelmed to even hear that in a time of economic instability, that it will cost the poorest amongst us more to live, due to increased charges levied against them, by the very department in our system that programs designed to aid them! Truly a shame!

Brudder

Saturday, July 18, 2009

Update on Gambling Numbers

Gambling rate declines in Newfoundland and Labrador, government says: That story appeared in The Telegram July 02, 2009 See Full Article.

Yesterday, The ALC, Atlantic Lottery Commission released it "Accountability Report" for for the past year.

Atlantic Lottery says that during the past year, over $398 million went to the provinces of Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island and Newfoundland and Labrador.

Every year 100 per cent of Atlantic Lottery profits go back to the four Atlantic provinces.

The corporation has released its 2008/09 accountability report which is available on the Atlantic Lottery website at http://www.alc.ca/English/AboutALC/AnnualReport

President and CEO Michelle Carinci said the corporation has put a renewed focus on putting the lotto player at the heart of every decision, initiative and game undertaken.

“One of the important ways we give back is through financial performance,” she said. The breakdown for the provinces includes:

Newfoundland and Labrador received $107.5 million, up more than $9 million from last year. The bulk of the increase, $74 million, came from video lottery terminals.

The report is inaccessible from the ALC site, but as per the 07/02/09 article, it's obvious Ross told yet another departing lie.

Brudder

Saturday, July 4, 2009

My Thoughts On VLT Numbers

Earlier I was reading a news blurb on the provincial gambling numbers of problem gamblers being down! I could not help but muse at the loosely described method used to reach this conclusion. Ross said we asked them! And 77% said they had not gambled much in the year! Asked who, Gamblers? Would they tell the truth? Isn’t it a widely understood fact that addicted gamblers will do anything, including lying to conceal their addiction? Is this a fool proof scientific process being used to gather data? Of course not, Ross old man, and you never cease to amaze me with your departments inexcusable excuses, and your posturing to hide the real facts in most cases!

I have a question for you Ross! There are indisputable facts that the first addictions in this province, beginning decades ago, were addictions to two retail goods, namely alcohol and tobacco products. It is known that both are proven to cause severe health issues and even death. With alcohol causing family breakups, violence and death via drunk driving accidents; and tobacco causing cancer and respiratory ailments; and the higher health care costs associated with all of these, isn’t your government exploiting the very people addicted by having the highest tax rate out of all other provinces on both of these product lines?

The very next provincially regulated addictions were pull tab tickets, once only allowed to be sold by charity or non profit organizations, until our government saw a windfall of potential profits being lost. So by deregulating the old policy concerning who was allowed to sell these tickets, and thereafter by implementing the current policy allowing any retailer, and even independent kiosks, to sell these commodities, government paved a highway to further misery for persons with addictions.

I remember when the old Atlantic Lottery unfolded, top prize was a hundred thousand dollars, whereas today we are giving away jackpots of 30-50 million dollars. Pull tabs were maxed out at $50.00, now many payout up to $500.00. Due to the statistical improbability of winning, these government regulated schemes are designed to literally steal peoples money, but those addicted will not recognize the no-win-system that it is!

This system was soon followed by the scratch ticket scenario! Same steal, same scheme, same progression of prize payout and ticket cost. I was at an Irving outlet recently, where a good friend is the manager. He told me, on a good week they sell 12-20 boxes of pull tabs and scratch. He said it was common to see people come in and buy a package of smokes, a Pepsi and twenty dollars worth of pull tabs, and take home another twenty in scratch. He added, we have quite a few regulars who do this daily, and many, many more who do this at least three times a week. I feel bad he said, our regulars are like our friends, you sense they have problems.

All of this was followed closely by the installation of the infamous VLT, where hundreds of millions of dollars are stolen from those who are often the most vulnerable of our citizens, and all for profit by government.

Ross, please do not “excuse” the fact that 90% of pubs and bars, especially the small town and rural operations stay open because of VLT profits, and not bar sale profits. I am surprised government has not found a way to use a debit/credit system where users can stop along sidewalk kiosks and use a plastic debit type card to pay for and receive winnings from VLT's, not unlike the alc.ca web site.

For Christ sake, even family restaurants have VLTs. Addictions do not have barriers, Ross. Have you ever been at a restaurant sitting near a table where a Mom, Dad and their kids are seated waiting for service. Then Mom and Dad enter into an indiscreet low tone argument over the addicted one of the two needing to play the machine while awaiting their order? Have you seen these same people receive their order, and the rest of the family is finished eating before Dad finally gets back to the table?

Ross, I have seen this often enough to know that change must happen. Life is about personal choice, but there is something fundamentally wrong when a government can not only provide, but profit form goods and services that literally kill people, destroy families and ruin futures for children!

Take a look around town. How many bars are now open before noon or after midnight these days? It seems that the regulated times of operation for the VLTs, combined with the reduced numbers of VLTs, have come to dictate the reported reduced revenue. I would suggest that this is the explanation for your numbers drop Ross, rather than your unsupported claim of an improvement in problem gambling statistics. Take your nose out of your ass long enough to admit there are 100s of thousands of Newfoundlander's out there who are smarter than they are being given credit for, smart enough to see through the BS, but only a handful with balls enough to tell you that you are lying or that you are wrong!

What I find most difficult to accept is the fact that government subtly admitted that there were going to be issues for people and their developing addictions; that there were huge profits to be made even while people and families would be hurting. This is evidenced just by the virtue that, behind the gambling schemes, government provided a multi hundred million plus Treatment Package per year to treat addictions, when they provided the means by which people became addicted in the first place. This spells huge profits, not contradiction.

The report appeard Sunday July 05/09 It does not refute my argument.... You decide! REPORT

Brudder