Groups that serve people with addictions say the Newfoundland and Labrador government is putting politics before patients, by locating a youth treatment centre in central Newfoundland.
Why wouldn't they say that? I happen to agree with these groups, the Liberal opposition and anyone who can understand the contradiction of
locating this facility in Grand Falls.
I understand the
dilemma that Grand Falls is in right now, but I am not sure placing this facility there, will be of any kind of economic resolve or
give any
economic empowerment to the individuals affected by the mill closure, and most certainly no long term benefit.
Realistically, can mill workers as they are treat addictions? How long will it take for any of them to receive social work, psychology,
counseling and the many other diverse degrees, coupled with the experience and
confidence it will take to treat the most vulnerable.
Do the residents of Grand Falls realize that this
decision will have no personal impact on them? This is a specialized service that will require specialized personal. What it will mean is a recruitment of professionals to come in and take up residence in your town, and at the end of the day, mill workers will still be hurting.
Truth is, it is a political move, and even the most politically illiterate amongst us would agree that it is, what is most
scary however, is the denial by the provinces most esteemed
politically elected.
Heck!
Wiseman's rebuttal to Yvonne Jones, leader of the
official opposition, on that thought yesterday, nearly had me convinced that he was telling the truth; then I noticed once again, that weasel like look in his face, blood pressure on max and the big turnaround to the PC caucus, where he looked for that spring loaded neck
nod and the Elvis Presley lip lock on the
faces of his colleagues, in a show of support for his argument. That was enough for me! It does not matter; Blue, Red or Orange, this call is half arsed, the
endorsement stupid and the justification totally political.
A story of my own, and by comparison, I was part of a Rural Development Business Plan Team several years ago, where as part of my job I had to write a proposal to the Federal Government, for a grant/funding project to repair a harbour breakwater, and to build an extension on the existing fisheries wharf.
The need, usefulness, and economic benefit of the project was
articulated flawlessly, and as well, I
identified and demonstrated the safety and hazard issues with the current system, and these were presented in video
format. In short, the
RFF was denied, there were no visits from
DFO, no inspections, inquiry or surveys, just short and to the point no!
Not to be out done, I took the very same proposal, changed a few particulars, along with the location and excluded the previous video tapes. I did however add a topographic map of the new location, otherwise, we'd used the original proposal in more than 90% of its original design and we tried again.
Three weeks later, and with great surprise when we received the letter of approval, and for 80 thousand dollars more than what was requested.
There was a huge irony in all of this however.... this entire project was proposed for a site that sat approximately 15 miles away from the nearest water source! I am quite sure I made my point on that.
The very words "Build New" makes me hurl. The Avalon is
entrenched with unused physical assets and infrastructure that can
accommodate this need!
We have a health care facility in that of the Health Science Centre for example, with entire wings that were once patient rooms now dedicated to junk and storage rooms. We have several such white elephant assets,
without tenants or customers.
On a more social and psychological side of the argument, children who are being treated for addictions out of St. John's, are reported to be from the city and surrounding area. It has been reported that these same cases account for more than 70% of all cases treated in the
Provence. These recovering teens need to be near their parents, and at the very least if they are in-patients in the first place!
Transportation,
accommodations and lack of access to
necessary secondary supports already established in St. John's, and ones that will be required for a successful recovery, are all key issues with placing this facility in Grand Falls.
There is a need for further thought on this, it starts with you!
Brudder